Rosa squarrosa ( Glandular Dog-rose) in Cambridgeshire

Rosa squarrosa ( Glandular Dog-rose) in Cambridgeshire.

Now that Dog Rose R. canina aggregate  has been split into three separate species and documented in a new BSBI handbook, Wild Roses of Great Britain and Ireland by Roger Maskew and Gareth Knass, BSBI Handbook no 26, I thought I would try and find a Rosa squarrosa to photograph.

Glandular Dog-rose, R. squarrosa, 17th June 26, Cambridgeshire.

Previously R. squarrosa was regarded as a subspecies of R. canina under the sub-species group Dumales.

 R. canina agg. is now split into three species ( Canina, corymbifera and squarrosa ). This creates the complication of defining each of the hybrids between them and also the Northern Dog-rose,  which has also been split into R. vosagiaca (Glaucous Dog-rose)and R. caesia (Northern Dog-rose). 

This particular plant was surprisingly green but I would not assume this is a characteristic of squarrosa or any other dog-rose.

The first characteristic feature I check is the pedicel ( flower stalk below the hypanthium (hip)) as dog- roses should have a clean stalk without any glands, which is the case here. 

The sepals are pinnate with a few glands. They are reflexed even at this early post flower stage, which  fits with squarrosa, canina and corymbifera. At this early stage, just after flowering, sepals are moving from their flowering position of being out and downward, pointing at about 45 degrees. Timing of the sepal movement seems to be quite variable and sepal position is normally looked at later when the hips have turned red.   In this particular example the sepals have moved to a reflexed position quickly.

Hypanthium, sepals, and pedicels. Group of two hips on long pedicels.

The photo below shows the sepal with pinnate lobes, which have glandular tipped side projections and also a leaflike extension. Despite R. squarrosa being glabrous (no hairs), hairs are allowed on the sepals and on the stigma cluster.

The photo below shows the disc and stigma/styles. The disc is quite conical which is common in Rosa canina and I assume can often occur in squarrosa. The stigma covers about half the conical disc and has some short hairs visible.

Other characteristics are that, the pedicels were between 1 to 2cm against a handbook range of 0.8-2cm, so that's OK, although I don't find pedicel length reliable as it seems to vary a lot even on the same bush. Extremely short or long pedicels are worth noting.

  The orifice was small at about or less than a 1/5th of the disc diameter. Note the long thin hole that the stigma threads pass through and its gradual opening out into the hip capsule. One of the few criticisms of the old handbook was the drawing of the R. canina sectioned hip by Margaret Gold, which showed a rapidly opening orifice inside. This is not typical of R. canina and I suspect the sample  she was given  may have satisfied the characteristics of R. canina, but had some Northern Dog-rose in it. Overall her drawings were really very good and in some cases better than the photos used in the new handbook.

Cut hypanthium showing orifice and domed disc. R. squarrosa

An example of an atypical orifice suggesting hybrid with Northern Dog-rose or just a variation due to the flat disc?.

Also a very round shape to the hypanthium/hip.  Hip shape is variable according to the new handbook including spherical, although in Cambridgeshire I speculate that a spherical hip may suggest some hybrid influence.  Hard to prove though.

An example of a canina type orifice with a almost flat disc.

Next up is to look at a leaf.

Leaflets 5-7 and broadly ovate to ovate-lanceolate, acute or subacute, rounded at base, according to the new handbook.     The leaves shown below are not drawn out to an attenuated tip, are well spaced and are hairless, as required, to be conforming with squarrosa. Tony O'Mahony, a rose expert from Ireland, has noted that leaf shape is highly variable in R. canina and this is probably true for R. squarrosa. 

'This field study revealed that the only common denominators between the various R. canina populations, was that they all displayed glabrous, non-glandular foliage.

Yet, in stark contrast to these two points of uniformity, was the remarkable fact that the

leaves of this species proved bewilderingly polymorphic, my observations recording

considerable morphological plasticity in leaflet shape, dimensions, toothing, texture and

colour – not only between populations, but often between individual, adjacent bushes in

hedgebanks and hedgerows. Moreover, no correlation could be found between these leaf

forms and other features of these bushes. '

This insight from Tony O'Mahony is really useful and it's pity that the new handbook does not highlight such information.

R. squarrosa.

Another important feature I look at, is the leaf stipule glands, a feature not mentioned in the new handbook, but which has been found to be really important. See previous blog on this feature, Identification of Roses, Leaf Stipules. 

Leaf stipule showing dense glands still present and mainly round in shape with only the occasional elongated gland. This is a bit odd as the dog-roses should have glands that fall off quickly and are elongated in shape. These are staying on and are mainly round balls, not the elongated shape. When confronted with a feature that does not quite fit, a larger sample should be looked at, ideally from more than one major stem.  

The petiole (leaf stem) is also shown in this photo and shows a lot of stalked glandular protrusions. The glandular protrusions being a key feature of R. squarrosa. Note also no soft hairs.

Next photo is of the rachis which also has lots of stalked red glands. Ignore the fibres brought in by the wind but note the rachis has no soft hairs.

The major feature of R. squarrosa is that it has no hairs (except on the styles and sepals), being glabrous. The stalked glands are not included as hairs.  Below is a photo of the rachis of R. corymbifera showing the dense soft hairs which are its key feature.

   R. corymbifera rachis with dense soft hairs. 

Back to my potential R. squarrosa. Next check leaf margin.

Leaf margin showing bi-serrate edge with the secondary tips having short stalked and sessile red  round glands. The primary tips have hydathodes which are conical in shape and lack the liquid ball, unlike the round glandular tips on the secondary tips. Note the hydathodes have veins running to them.

According to the new handbook R. squarrosa can have either bi-serrate to multi-serrate margins. 

The underside of the leaf is glabrous, not a hair to be seen even on the midrib, just the occasional stalked red gland.

Prickles of R. squarrosa.

Conclusion.

This particular plant matches the expected features of what a Rosa squarrosa should look like, with the only aberrant feature being the round, more permanent glands on the stipules. This does suggest a slight introgression in the past with a Sweet Briar or a Downy Rose but no other sign of this was apparent. The bright green colour of the leaves was also unusual. 

 I think this plant could be regarded as belonging to the species as defined by the new handbook and we don't need to investigate further hybrids. A small amount of introgression is acceptable. The most common hybrid would be with Northern Dog-rose now split into R. caesia and R. vosagiaca.

The hybrid with either of the Northern Dog-roses would tend to show reddish stems, which were completely lacking in the plant described above. The new handbook says R. squarrosa, 'often strongly red-pigmented in open habitats in late summer' so the red stems appear to be an unreliable feature?

The influence of either caesia or vosagiaca would tend to have groups of hips (3-4)  on unusually short pedicels with large bracts that obscure the pedicels and large hips, densely hairy styles forming a dome-shaped head and blue-green back to the leaflets.

The plant above had 1-2(3) hips with longer pedicels. The pedicels were towards the 2cm range and the bracts did not cover them.  Before these splits, R. canina group ( canina agg.) were the most common rose in Cambridgeshire followed by hybrids with the Northern Dog-rose, despite the fact that Northern Dog-roses do not occur this far south, being limited to north of a line between the Severn Estuary and the Wash. On recent field trips I have found the Northern dog-rose hybrids to be very common but working out what are the parents are is not easy. Hybrids are fertile and backcross.

Hopefully these photos will encourage the purchase of the new rose handbook. It's not perfect but is a major advance. It is photo based and covers a wide range of rose species and hybrids. The increase in the number of hybrids will be quite a challenge.

 Although the conventional wisdom suggests that roses should only be examined in late summer based on the hip being fully formed and sepal position/falling off being critical, I think a lot can be done when roses are in flower. Sepal position changes as the hips ripen and this seems to have very variable timing.

Difficult plants may often require a second visit to aid final identification. 

Finally I have been caught out several times by two different species growing together with intertwined stems which caused confusion, until that was pointed out by someone more expert than I.

Peter Leonard

Cambridgeshire

June 2026

See also, previous blog on Identification of Roses, Leaf Stipules.

Veronica cymbalaria Pale Speedwell

Veronica cymbalaria Pale Speedwell

Complications with the identification of a rare mediterranean alien in Britain. A species which has more variation than you might think from the literature.

Veronica cymbalaria, Crete, April 2026  

Veronica cymbalaria, Faversham, Kent, 10 Feb 2026.

Veronica cymbalaria has occurred in five sites in Britain and Ireland. First recorded in 1985 by B.M.Sturdy near Penzance where it persists, at least to 2023. Recorded near Glasgow in 1999 and also in Belfast. More recently found on a petrol forecourt by Paul Stanley in Southampton in March 2023.

It also was found in Faversham, Kent on 5th Feb 2021 by F. R. Gomes. I assume all these records conform to the standard form with hairy capsules.

Veronica cymbaleria has a Mediterranean distribution with records north to Germany and east to Iran.

The key features of cymbaleria are the pure white flowers (6-10mm Dia.) and the leaf shape with 5-9 lobes and the terminal lobe being wider, but not as pronounced as in V. hederifolia.  It is stated in nearly all the literature that another key feature is the hairy capsule, compared to the hairless capsule of V. hederifolia. 

V. cymbalaria, Faversham, 10Feb 2026. Capsule and sepals.

V. cymbalaria, Faversham, 10Feb 2026. 

Veronica hederifolia. note hairless capsule and pointed hairy sepals.

The identification features seemed straight forward until a visit to Crete in April 26 where some plants had hairless capsules. The majority of V. cymbalaria plants in Crete had the expected hairy capsules. The Crete plants did have glandular stem hairs, which was not seen on the Faversham plants.

 In two sites in Crete, some plants had completely hairless capsules and sepals combined with glandular hairs on the upper stems. They grew together with the hairy capsule plants and had the same flower size and general appearance.

The question was whether these hairless capsule plants are a different species or just a variation on V. cymbalaria?.   

V. cymbalaria glabrous (hairless) sepals and capsule. 

V. cymbalaria at Late Minoan Cemetery at Armani, Crete. April 26

Hairy version of V. cymbalaria , Crete, April (growing with hairless capsule version). Note the glandular hairs on upper stem, sepals and capsule. Glandular hairs are not typical but may come from V. trichadena, one of its parents. 

Research on the web indicates that V. cymbalaria is polymorphic and can have versions that have hairless capsules. A very similar species with hairless capsules is described as V. panormitana but that has smaller flowers. V. panormitana is regarded as the other parent.  

From Web search...

The term "polymorphic" in relation to Veronica cymbalaria (Pale Speedwell) refers to its complex genetic and evolutionary history, characterized by multiple chromosome counts (polyploidy) and varied physical forms. 

Polyploidy and Genetic Diversity

• Multiple Origins: Research shows that tetraploid (2n=4x) and hexaploid (2n=6x) versions of this species evolved independently several times in the Mediterranean.
• Complex Evolution: It is part of a "polyploid complex," meaning it has several sets of chromosomes from different parent lineages, leading to high genetic variation.
• Genetic Markers: Scientists use polymorphic SSR markers (microsatellites) to study gene flow and how these different genetic versions are related.

Morphological Characteristics

• Variable Appearance: While generally a sprawling annual with white flowers (6–12 mm), it can range from being almost hairless to very hairy (glandular hairs).
• Leaf Shape: Its leaves are round or "cymbal-like," typically having 5 to 9 lobes, which distinguishes it from similar species like Veronica hederifolia.

Two papers on the subject are :-

1) From 2022. An overview of Veronica in general but based on work by Manfred A Fisher who was the expert on this family.  Includes a photo comparison of V. cymbalaria and V. panormitana showing the smaller flowers of the latter. Early genetic work was indicating that V. cymbalaria in its polyploid forms are derived from V. panormitana and V. trichadena.  

What is a species in Veronica? Reflections ...Zobodathttps://www.zobodat.at › NEIL_13-14_0305-0323 

2) From 2007. A very complex paper:-  Amplified fragment polymorphisms and sequence data in the phylogenetic analysis of polypoids, Multiple origins of Veronica Cymbalaria. 

 Not much help except to confirm that the V. cymbalaria complex is variable in features and has a very complex history involving V. panormitana and V. trichadena with diploid?, tetraploid and hexaploid forms.

For the practical botanist one feature of interest was that the stomata size from lower bracts was measured and found to be:-

Diploid   25.8 +/- 2.4 micrometers.  2n=18

Tetraploid  35.5+/- 2.7 micrometers. 2n=36

Hexaploid. 40.7 +/- 3.5 micrometers.   2n=54

"In a conservative approach plants with stomata 32.5-37 micrometer were designated as tetraploid.

Those with stomata between 42 and 46 micrometers long were designated as hexaploid. Environmental factors could cause quite a large variation in stomata size." I assume a reasonably large sampler size would need to be taken for this to be useful. Pity I did not take a sample of a leaf.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02172.xopen_in_new

Conclusion.

V. cymbalaria is a complex with various sub-species listed but I failed to find detailed descriptions of the sub-species and I guess that the hairless capsule plants are just an example of variation rather than a different species. Hairs are a defence against insects, especially those with glandular tips but use energy to create. The majority of plants seen on Crete were of the standard type with hairy capsules and sepals, so it might be concluded that having hairs is a better option in evolutionary terms. Alternatively the plants without hairs might prove more successful in time and that is an example of the fundamental driver of survival. The presence of hairs can be variable in a species. I found this in a previous blog covering Cat's-ear which had examples of hairless capitulum to very hairy. 

   There seems to be some uncertainty about V. cymbalaria occurring in a diploid form but this may depend on region?. The following map does not show any diploid forms of V. cymbalaria but this maybe because the paper is investigating the tetraploid and hexaploid forms arising from trichadena and panormitana. A diploid form has been reported from Kurdistan.

Map from the scientific paper above, 2.

Most of the literature describing Veronica cymbalaria does not cover the variation that this species can show. It is so rare in the British Isles that most British floras do not cover the species at all. How plants of this species occurred here, in such a random widespread distribution is unknown but they have and will no doubt, occur in the future.   It is possible that future examples may conform to the glabrous capsule version that I saw in Crete. Most of the literature does not cover the extent of variation and this includes the following article from New Zealand which has a table showing differences between related species in the group. Well worth reading as it covers all three related species.

Finally an interesting and comprehensive report about finding V. cymbalaria in New Zealand and making sure it was indeed that species, rather than V. panormitana or V. trichadena. 

Veronica cymbalaria, a new record for New ZealandNew Zealand Plant Conservation Networkhttps://bts.nzpcn.org.nz › site › assets › files › ak_...

Peter Leonard

Cottenham, Cambridgeshire

April 2026

i

Veronica agrestis and Veronica polita

Veronica agrestis ( Green Field Speedwell) and Veronica polita ( Grey Field Speedwell).

Although the main distinguishing feature between these two similar species is the type of hair on the seed capsule, in practice this is far less clear cut that the current literature implies. 

Several identification articles have been published recently covering Speedwells from the recent Beginner's Corner paper by Mike Crewe in BSBI News Winter 2025 158, page 21, and

  'A pictorial guide to some of the more common Speedwells of the British Isles' by Moira O'Donnell in the Wild Flower Magazine Autumn 2021. 

These articles and many identification guides like the revised version of The Wild Flower Key by Francis Rose, Harrap's Wild Flowers, and the new British & Irish Wildflowers and Plants, A pocket Guide, all state that Veronica agrestis has capsules with long glandular hairs ONLY.

Maybe this is true in some places but it is certainly not correct in East Anglia. This was pointed out back in 2010 by Bob Leaney, BSBI News, April 2010, No 114.

Common problems with identification in the field – experience

with the Norfolk Flora Group

13. Veronica agrestis (Green Field- speedwell)/V. polita (Grey Field-speedwell) The only clear-cut vegetative field character here, according to Poland & Clement, would seem to be the longer petioles in A. polita (<4 mm, as opposed to <2 mm). I have looked at about twenty specimens in the field and NWH, and found that leaf shape and colour were often intermediate and unhelpful. Attempts to separate these two in the field usually resolve around the capsule hairs, but these need a ·20 lens and good light conditions to interpret, and usually there is a difference of opinion! When one gets a few capsules under the microscope at home, moreover, one often comes to a different conclusion! In my opinion, a much better field character is the shape of the sepals, where there is a very clear cut and invariable difference. The sepals of V. polita are always broadly ovate, with the distal edges straight and converging onto a sub-acute or acute tip. Those of V. agrestis, on the other hand, are narrowly elliptic-lanceo- late, with +/- parallel sides and the distal curving very gradually to a rounded tip (see illustration). In fresh material these sepal characters correlate absolutely with the capsule hairs, and they also correlate well with leaf colour and shape when these characters are clear cut one way or the other.

Recently Mike Wilcox has a useful article in BSBI News issue 153 April 2023 'Distinguishing Veronica agrestis from Veronica polita', which correctly states that Veronica agrestis can have mostly long glandular hairs, though a few eglandular hairs can occur. Mike Wilcox also introduces a new feature which is that the stigma is squeezed between the two capsule lobes whereas Veronica polita has a longer stigma which is not held so tightly due to a slight difference in capsule shape.

My conclusion is that recent literature, except Bob Leaney and Mike Wilcox, has often simplified the hair characteristics, as if you go back to the excellent Clapham, Putin and Warburg 'Flora of the British Isles' 1962 it states V. agrestis capsule with long glandular hairs, often with rather shorter glandless ones'.

I have been taking photos of speedwells in an attempt to produce a photo guide and have found that all features that differentiate these two species are subject to qualifications. An example being the sepal shape that Bob Leaney was keen on. This can only be relied on when the capsule is fully developed as the broad sepals of V. polita get wider during the development of the capsule. Looking at the sepals at the flowering stage does not help as they may be as narrow as those in V. agrestis.

V. polita flower showing narrow sepals. 25th Feb 26

            Sepals at flower stage are both narrow and have not developed their final useful shape. Sepals may enlarge to protect the seed capsule as the seeds develop. The capsule hairs are another defensive feature to protect the seeds that are inside the capsule.
 

V. polita at capsule stage showing both types of hair and ovate sepal.

The above photo shows that the fully developed sepal shape is wider and ovate, in that it has the widest point below the middle and has an acute tip. However there is variation as shown by the left sepal which is not as wide. The stigma still looks quite fresh so this sepal may develop further. 

V. agrestis sepals (despite having some slight lobing) are oblong/linear with parallel sides and rounded tip. Overall a more narrow shape.

V. agrestis showing narrow oblong/linear sepals shape. It appears to have a unusually short stigma which looks fresh and not decaying yet. 17Jul 2022

Conclusion. The sepal shape is a good feature but only when the capsule is well developed.

How to identify between these two species and Common Field Speedwell ( V. persica).

1) Flowers. In many cases the first thing that stands out when looking at both V. agrestis and V. polita is that the flowers are much smaller than a typical V. persica Common Field Speedwell.  Flower colour can be variable in speedwells and paler to white examples of many species can occur. 

Flower colour is also a good guide as V. agrestis has pale flowers often very pale almost white, whereas V. polita often has really dark blue flowers, but can have paler flowers which makes some look intermediate. Occasionally speedwells have white flowers, so flower colour is a good guide but not conclusive. I have never seen a V. agrestis with dark blue flowers.

2) Capsule. Second step is to look at the capsule if you can find one. It is important to find a fully developed capsule as early or sterile ones do not show the shape differences which are useful.  

The capsules nearest the flower will be the most undeveloped so it is good to move down the stem and check several capsules. The most developed will have the stigma decayed back so that comparing stigma length at that stage has difficulties but works well for sepal shape. 

Capsule shape can vary as seen in V. persica. The capsule lobes are not spreading in both V. agrestis and V. polita, whereas the lobes of V. persica has spreading lobes. The next photos show that the spread in V. persica does vary.  A feature rarely photographed. The shape is quite distinct however except in sterile or undeveloped capsules which can cause confusion.

V. persica capsule with less than usual lobe spread. 4th Jun 2023  

V. persica capsule with limited lobe spread and starts to approach the capsule shape of V. polita, 16Apr25

Note the capsule even in this extreme case, is much wider than tall whereas V. polita/V. agrestis would be square in profile being about as tall as wide. 

V. persica with typical lobe spread. 22April 25

Note the very long thin stigma which is often bent over and is protruding well beyond the top glandular hairs. The capsule hairs are a mixture of long glandular hairs and short slightly curved eglandular hairs. Density of both type of hairs can vary considerably. Sepal shape is quite variable at capsule stage.

Capsule shape and hairs, V. agrestis.

V. agrestis 10Jun2025

Note the long glandular hairs and no shorter eglandular hairs and the narrow sepals have rounded tips.

This one fits the literature. Slightly deformed lobes are unusual.

V. agrestis 11Jun2025
Note narrow sepals with rounded tips and just a few short eglandular hairs on capsule.

 V. agrestis Capsule with more short eglandular hairs amongst  the longer glandular hairs. Cottenham, Cambs. 11Jun2025

V. agrestis, showing how tight the stigma is held between the two lobes. 16Jun2025

V. agrestis. an example of variation as the stigma is not held tightly between lobes. 9Feb26

This photo shows that although the overall shape of two parallel lobes is good, the tightness of the held stigma can vary, so although this is a useful feature and can be a good guide but should be considered with other features, before making a determination. I suppose we should not be surprised having seen the variation in the V. persica in photos above. In my experience the feature of a tightly held stigma works most of the time but occasionally fails, but that's botany. The identification of this particular plant was based on the narrow sepal shape with parallel sides and rounded tip, the capsule hairs being mainly long glandular with few eglandular and the stigma although fairly fresh ( white colour with brown tip) being quite short, protruding out less than the hairs.

Capsule shape and hairs, V. polita.

Typically a dense fuzz of short eglandular hairs outnumbers the long glandular hairs in V. polita. but beware variation as mentioned above by Bob Leaney.

V. polita 13May2025 with fresh stigma protruding well beyond hairs.

Capsule hairs are a mixture of longer glandular hairs and quite dense short eglandular hairs. Broad ovate shape to sepals and stigma not held tightly between lobes.

V. polita 13May2025

The stigma although starting to decay is still protruding well beyond the level of the longest hairs.

The sepal shape is broad, ovate and reasonably pointed at the apex. The capsule hairs are a mixture of long and short, about 50:50 in quantity. V. polita have been seen with lobed sepals which adds a bit more challenge.

V. polita  10Jun2025

The stigma has started to decay and turn brown but still remains long and protruding well beyond the hairs. Lots of short eglandular hairs.

Flowers.

V. polita, only three petals, just another example of variation.10Jul2023

V. polita, typical dark flowered example. 11Apr2023

V. agrestis. 10Aug2023

V. agrestis 17Jul2022

3) Other features.

Many books mention the difference in leaf colour, hence the English names Green and Grey however in practice there seems to be overlap and leaf colour seem more dependent on growing conditions. Occasionally V. polita seems to have thicker more fleshy leaves which are dull but again this is not consistent. There is some truth that the length vs width of V. agrestis leaves suggests that the longer leaves of V. agrestis vs 'the length similar to the width' for V. polita is a useful feature however the shape of leaves is quite variable. 

V. polita, leaf length similar to width.

V. agrestis Leaf shape longer than wide.

Stigma length. The problem with stigma length is that the stigma will decay back, going brown and becoming shorter sometimes quickly . Also there seems to be quite a variation in the length. When fresh, the length of  the stigma in V. agrestis may just reach beyond the top of the long glandular hairs but is often much shorter. In V. polita the stigma often reaches well beyond the top of the longest hairs.

Best to check several capsules and forget those which have decayed stigma. If you can find a stigma well beyond the hairs it is a V. polita. 

Stem hairs.  Upper stem hairs of both species are dense curved short hairs with a few long hairs, on lower stems the short hairs become less, leaving just long hairs equal to the width of the stem in length.

V. agrestis upper stems have dense short hairs in two bands with some longer hairs. V. polita has short hairs which are longer than the short hairs in V. agrestis and mixed in with longer hairs. Looks more untidy.

 I am not sure stem hairs will distinguish V. polita from V. agrestis, as a larger sample would need to be checked.

Veronica agrestis, upper stem hairs tend to be very short and dense with occasional long hairs.

The dense short hairs are curved and are more dense in two broad lines down the stem. 

V. ploita, upper stem hairs, hairs slightly longer and more a mixture of long and short.

Conclusion.

The above is based on plants seen in Cambridgeshire and Kent only. Although many plants are not too difficult to separate, care should be taken to check all relevant features to make a determination.  

I order of importance I would suggest, Flower colour, capsule hairs, sepal shape but beware some variation like V. agrestis having pointed apex and then stigma length and tightness of stigma being held.

Leaves of V. agrestis are slightly longer but V. polita leaves are often longer than wide as well, so difficult to use as a feature. 

Leaf stalk, petiole is about 1.5X stem thickness in V. polita vs. about 1-2X in V. agrestis and is too variable to be useful.

Peter G. Leonard

March 2026

Cottenham. 

                          V. agrestis                                                  V. polita

V. agrestis. close up of capsule hairs showing a few shorter hairs.