Monday, 3 August 2020

Forget-me-not. How hard can it get?

Forget-me-not. How hard can it get?

Wood Forget-me-not Myosotis sylvatica, Rampton, 18th April 2020

When you consider dry habitat Forget-me-nots there are only four common species to consider. The field guides indicate that the flower size may be the key identifying feature however the dimensions of the flower may not be adequate to distinguish one species from another.  A quick check in the more serious literature emphasises this point, especially if you are (un)lucky enough to find a plant with flowers that are not the standard size e.g. sylvatica var. sylvatica.
Species considered here:-

Wood Forget-me-not           Myosotis sylvatica                           Flower size  8-10mm dia.
                                            Myosotis sylvatica var. sylvatica                      4-8mm dia.
Field Forget-me-not            Myosotis arvensis                            Flower size  1.5-3mm dia.
Changing Forget-me-not     Myosotis discolor                            Flower size  1-3mm dia.
Early Forget-me-not            Myosotis ramosissima                     Flower size  1-3mm dia.

To quote Sell and Murrell. m arvensis, ramosissima and sylvatica run into one another and are difficult to distinguish on precise characters but usually be recognised in the field when all taxa involved have become familiar.  Well that's reasonably hopeful but then quotes Arther Chater who says "In Cardiganshire, pollen size is the only reliable difference between M. ramosissma and M. discolor."
Pollen size is well beyond me so,  I just though I will put up a few photos from Cambridgeshire and see what we find.

This all started due to a potted up sample of Erophila developing three tiny Forget-me-nots which required identification. These three unexpected plants were small and the flowers were also small.  I have never really looked at Forget-me-nots before so it seemed a good 'lock down' activity. Wood and Field Forget-me-not also grow in the garden.

Wood and Field FMN are both common so I will start with that pair.



M. sylvatica is really a garden plant and has large flowers typically 8-9mm across.  It is planted and it escapes. Field FMN M. avensis is the poor relation with much smaller flowers.  It is interesting to note that apart from the flower size, the other dimensions of the pedicle and stem are much the same for both species.
The pedicle is slightly longer that the length of the calyx.  The calyx of the Wood FMN are open in fruit whereas the tips of the calyx are almost touching in Field FMN.  This is apparently a good feature but just how reliable it is after the comments by Sell is to be seen. The angle of the pedicle from the stem is not reliable.

Field FMN left, Wood FMN Right
Apart from the size difference, the point of this photo is to show how the stem terminates in a fine display of 3-5 open flowers in both species.  The flowers emerge from a ammonite like spiral at the stem tip in Forget-me-nots.  The flowers start off pink and change to blue when open. The Yellow ring called the 'Fornice' at the base of the petals changes to white as the flower ages.

M. avensis Field Forget-me-not showing spiral of forming flowers.
Note the pink petals on the flower just about to open. The calyx holding the corolla tube is very hairy with hooked ends.  All the species considered here have these hairs. Also note the stem and pedicle have hairs that lie flat. They start patent ( at right angles) and turn through 90 degrees very quickly to lie against the stem.

M. arvensis showing all pink petals.
This plant has forgotten to change its petals to blue, uncommon but a well known variation.

M sylvatica Wood FMN showing stem hairs near flowers are flattened onto stem.
The above photo of Wood FMN showing the spiral of flowers which is much the same as in the previous photo of the Field FMN apart from the size of the flowers.

M. sylvatica, upper stem hairs

M. sylvatica Stem hairs























M arvensis, upper hairs

M. arvensis Stem





















Again the stem hairs in both species seem the same with lower stem hairs being long and patent and upper hairs being flattened.  The leaves have long simple hairs on both sides plus on the midrib. No veins are visible. The leaves have no stalk. The leaves are alternate.

Calyx hooked hairs.

M. arvensis calyx
M. sylvatica calyx  
Disregard the red colour in the photo of M. sylvatica above, the red is from the background now removed and since the hairs are transparent it shows the background colour.  The hairs from the base to just over halfway are curved to the point of being hooked. Outer hairs are straight. The hairs in M. arvensis do in general appear to be longer and more dense than in M. sylvatica. The tips of the calyx tend to be close together in M. arvensis and open in M. sylvatica , but this is not always clear cut and may be dependent on whether nutlets are present.

As far as the two species growing in my garden are concerned,  separation by flower size is easy. The problem comes with  larger flowered versions of Field Forget-me-not, being occasionally recorded usually associated with woodlands. According to Alan Leslie, in the new Flora of Cambridgeshire, these large flowered versions are regarded as equated to subspecies .umbrata  and have a different chromosome number 2n=66 ( 2n=36,48,52 is reputed for subspecies arvensis).

Field Forget-me-not growing in poor soil on the Fleam Dyke can have small flowers, down to a diameter of 1.5mm.
Field FMN. Very small flowers from Fleam Dyke

The situation with Wood Forget-me-not , M. sylvatica is also complicated by a variant  M.sylvatica.var sylvatica  which has flowers 4-8mm wide and is regarded as the original wild type.  There is a another larger flowered variation var. cults with flowers 8-11mm which is usually a garden escape. These garden escapes can have bright blue flowers and also white flowers are not unknown.

I would conclude that any examples with intermediate size flowers would present quite a challenge since the open vs. closed calyx in fruit might not be 100% reliable?.  This is where secondary features like the density of hooked calyx hairs come in.

Unfortunately the nutlet shape  is not a reliable indicator of species as some M. sylvatica have nutlets with only a tiny rim, being much the same as M. arvensis. The other factor is that as the nutlets dry out, their shape changes.

M. sylvatica left, M. sylvatica var. sylvatica middle, M. arvensis right.
The Wood FMN M. sylvatica flowers are about 8mm across , the var. sylvatica 5mm and the Field FMN M. arvensis about 3mm although they can be smaller.  These intermediate sized flowers would be easy to miss and identification depends on the calyx being open or closed and the density of the calyx hooked hairs. In this case the combination of calyx being open and the dense hooked hairs suggested M. sylvatica var.  sylvatica.  


Early Forget-me-not Myosotis ramosissima.

M. ramosissima Upper stem and flowers. No spiral, only two more buds hidden. (Isleham potted plant)
The standout feature of the three plants in the pot is that the flowers are tiny.  They were measured at just under 1.5mm across. The plants are also small being 50mm high with either one stem leaf or no stem leaves.


M. ramosissima. Flower less than 1.5mm diameter. Isleham site. Potted
The flower has the same fused petals ( just at the base) , and the yellow fornice, just like the larger species but the petals are very pale with limited blue towards the outside and a white base.

M.ramosissima.  Cambridge
M. ramosissima, Cambridge. Fruiting calyx are open.
M. ramosissima.

The plants from Isleham now potted up (with my Erophila) have paler flowers than the Cambridge site.
They both have fruiting calyces that are open so you can see the seeds developing.  The three potted plants do not show the spiral of new buds. In the first photo two more new buds are hidden from view, becoming the tip of the stem. See below.

M. ramosissima tip of flowering stem. (Isleham Potted)
This lack of a multi-flowered spiral seems to be a feature of Early FMN but whether it is a reliable difference from Changing FMN is unknown.  The above photo shows two flowers open and only two new buds forming. The lack of a spiral of new buds is apparent in all the Changing FMN's seen so far.

A limited sample from only one site and the Wild Flower Finder site
https://wildflowerfinder.org.uk/Flowers/F/Forgetmenot(Early)/Forgetmenot(Early).htm  has photos showing that some plants have more buds than others.  Even they have a limited number (estimate six), of buds in the spiral whereas the photo below has 14 buds in the spiral.

Changing Forget-me-not showing extent of spiral with 14 buds.
It is possible that the tiny plants I am looking at have a limited number of buds but larger plants might show more of a spiral? What does seem consistent is that the flowers of M. ramosissima point upwards but M. discolor point downwards and horizontally and are fading by the time they start to point upwards.


M. ramosissima nutlets,  no rim, convex both sides.
Top, Early FMN , below Field FMN M. arvensis.
Note the thin stem ( 1mm) and short pedicles on the Early FMN as well as the small flowers. A much thinner plant that given good growing conditions can grow quite tall. Generally seems to have fewer leaves than Field FMN. Tends to only display one or two open flowers that keep their yellow fornice.      


Changing Forget-me-not M. discolor  

Two sub-species are present in the UK.
M. discolor ssp. discolor
      Upper stem leaves nearly opposite.
      Caylx is bell shaped with teeth not converging in fruit.
      Yellow corolla at first    1.5 - 4mm across .

M. discolor ssp. dubia
      Upper leaves alternate
      Calyx is pear shaped with caylx teeth converging in fruit.
      Cream/white corolla at first.

The following photos show ssp dubia.


M. discolor, Cambridge showing white flower emerging.
The Changing Forget-me-not shares the same small size of the Early FMN with tiny flowers.
As the name suggests the flowers change colour as they open which is not uncommon in all these species but the difference is that they change colour after they have fully opened. They open being white or yellow and change to pale blue then darken. The internet shows examples that remain yellow or white so there is variation in unusual cases.

M. discolor with open white flower. Stem hairs flattened to upper stem. Long patent hairs
on lower stem and leaves.

M. discolor 
M. discolor Note yellow fornice ring stays yellow.

M. discolor nutlets , no rim, convex both sides

Nutlets will not distinguish between Early and Changing Forget-me-nots, both have the same shape.

Conclusion. These four dry habitat Forget-me-nots are not quite as easy to separate as the field guides suggest and variation in flower size between Field and Wood requires careful attention to the calyx hooked hairs in order to conclude the identification in intermediate flowered plants.

In Cambridgeshire with a very limited sample it would appear that Early FMN (M. ramosissima) has flowers that point upwards when opening and Changing FMN (M. discolor) has flowers that open when pointing slightly downwards and then change colour and are fading by the time they are pointing vertically upwards. The spiral in Changing FMN seems to hold more flowering buds. Is this true in other parts of the country?

Peter Leonard
Rampton July 2020

end.






Sunday, 31 May 2020

Christmas Tree in May?

Identification of 'Christmas' Tree in May.


Lockdown Project. What is the conifer planted by the Rampton village hall?

I have never really got to grips with conifers, just one of those 'never quite got round to' tasks. I have quite a few tree books but they tend to jump straight into species.  With so many species and cultivars planted some knowledge of the genus groups would be useful.

The tree in question had no cones visible, it is not an old tree and in many ways unremarkable.

Checking through the books, I found 'Know Your Conifers',  Forestry Commission Booklet No 15  Price 6s 0d.   1970.   This had some good advice based on looking at the leaves. There is a warning to avoid upright leading shots or juvenile foliage.  'Go for the side branches' sounded good as some were within reach.
Leaves from tip of side branch of the Rampton tree.
Fist trick is that you can see the individual leaves or should I call them needles?.   They are not all tight to the stem so we can exclude a whole group of difficult conifers like Leylandii and Lawson Cypress.  Example photo below.

Leaves tight to stem. Flattish foliage.
Flattish tight leaves are probably from the genus Chamaecyparis which includes Lawsons Cypress or the genus Thuja which includes Western Red Cedar. We can exclude those.

Pines of the genus Pinus have  needles grouped in two's, three's or fives's so we can exclude those as well as we have single needles on the Rampton tree. The hemlock or Thuga genus  have needles that vary in length which the tree in question also does not have. I know it's not a Yew or a Juniper.

Juniper.
The next trick is to see how the individual needle is attached to the stem as that is a key identification feature. The needles are attached with a short brown peg.

Needles attached by a short brown 'peg'.

From the 'Know Your Conifers' booklet.

So now I know I am dealing with a spruce from the genus Picea because the needles are attached with a peg.

What kind of Spruce?

The "Know your Conifers' book covers two species of spruce, Norway and Sitka because back in 1970 that is what they grew commercially.

Actually there are quite a lot of spruces. Most are exotic, planted in gardens and arboretums.
The most common Spruce is Norway Spruce Picea abies and that is 'readily told apart from others by its soft mid-green needles, which are pointed but not sharply so'.

The Sitka Spruce Picea sitchensis has bluish or slate-grey tinted needles which end in a sharp point.
A short video from Jim Waterson picks out key features of Norway Spruce:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2naxGZKOgY&list=PLRKWnZs4l1bBDFiFRME9zuvHYyZnCJ1Xm&index=6

The key features being classic green top and bottom of the needles which are of even length, and are distributed round the stem to give bottle brush like effect. Texture not harsh to the touch.

All this seems to fit with the tree beside the village hall. Norway Spruce used to be the most common Christmas tree but has been superseded by the Nordmann Fir.

The double check. See what a Norway Spruce looks like at Lynford Arboretum.

Norway Spruce Picea abies trunk

Picea abies needles attached by pegs.
This looks just like the village hall tree. The needles are green looking from the top and from the bottom. This is because the lines of white stomata are the same on all four faces of the needle. The stomata are in two or more usually three rows, of evenly spaced white dots. The brown stem has an interesting pattern and have almost no hairs. No hairs is a identification feature to separate different species of spruce.

Picea abies new growth showing the lines of stomata.
The needle tips can be seen to be quite pointed and the pegs are still green on new shoots.



 Needle attachment in other conifers, a few examples follow.

1) Silver Firs, genus Abies have needles attached by little green suckers.

Example, Grecian Fir Abies cephalonica.

Abies cephaloncia, needle attachment.

2) Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii.  Foliage most like the silver Firs but suckers are tiny and only evident when the needle is pulled off.

Pseudotsuga menziesii, needle attachment.

3) Western Hemlock Tsuga heterophylla.  The leaves are different lengths and do not have the same shape being flatter. The needles have thin bases that run parallel to the stem.

Tsuga heterophylla, 

Conclusion.

Little brown pegs mean Spruce,  Genus Picea. The tree outside the village hall is a Norway Spruce.
I have learnt just a little about conifers, so a start has been made.

Final shot another Spruce species to show pegs.


Serbian Spruce Picea omorika with pegs and hairy stems.

The End

Peter Leonard
24th May 2020



Wednesday, 13 May 2020

Herb Robert (Geranium robertianum) and Little Robin (Geranium purpureum)

Herb Robert (Geranium robertianum) and Little Robin (Geranium purpureum)

My Geranium ID Key Blog of last August highlighted the main differences between these two similar species; i.e. the smaller flowers of Little Robin and its yellow anthers. The blog did lack detail on the hairs that Little Robin displays. Here are a few additional photos to show Little Robin against the much more common Herb Robert.
Herb Robert left and Little Robin right, showing the size difference in the flower. 11th May 2020, Cambridge.
White petal lines more prominent in Herb Robert.

Little Robin showing the yellow anthers, Cambridge
Herb Robert showing orange anthers 28th June 2019 Cork

Herb Robert with dark purple anthers 17 June 2019
Herb Robert normally has dark purple anthers but can have orange anthers.
The pollen of both species is yellow so when comparing the anther colour pick a flower that has anthers which have not opened to avoid confusion.


Little Robin, sepal hairs 11th May 2020. Cambridge
Neglecting the stray hairs picked up from a nearby composite, the Little Robin has sepal hairs which are different lengths and have red glandular tips. These are similar to the hairs on the upper flower stem.

Herb Robert 28th June 2019, Cork showing the very long sepal hairs.
Herb Robert sepal hairs, 11th May 2020, Rampton
Herb Robert also has tiny red glandular tips to the sepal and flower stem hairs. The length is much longer for many of the hairs compared with Little Robin. The sepal hairs are longer than the flower stem hairs but the flower stem hairs also have some long hairs. Some non glandular hairs are also present on the flower stems and the main stems have curved simple hairs pointing downwards.

Little Robin, flower stem hairs similar to sepals but less dense. Ignore the stray composite hairs.

In summary Little Robin has sepal hairs that look quite normal whereas Herb Robert seem excessive.
This is a generalisation and sepal and flower stem hairs will vary depending on the population. The amount of hairs is a variable feature, however this is an interesting difference.

Leaves.

Little Robin has pale green leaves that look smooth and hairless to the naked eye. A close look shows they do have some hairs. Herb Robert can have slightly darker green leaves and again it is easy to miss the sparse hairs. Leaf shape is similar between these species. Stems are often red in both species. It is usually regarded as impossible to identify these two species apart, using vegetative features.

Pale green leaf of Little Robin, with some sparse hairs just visible. 11th May 2020 Cambridge
Some leaves have a thiner shape.

Little Robin leaf, 11th may 2020 Cambridge.

Stem Hairs

Stem hairs are mainly short downward curved hairs without glandular tips. G. purpureum
Stem hairs are mainly the short curved hairs but occasional simple long hairs are present or some stems may be hairless.


Hybrids between these two species have been found and the situation in Europe is apparently more difficult due to variation.  Herb Robert has chromosome count 2n=64, Little Robin 2n=32.
Some suggest that Little Robin is a parent of Herb Robert. Cross fertilisation experiments have been done but the situation in the wild is not clear. It is suggested that some hybrids have no flowers but I can't see how you would prove that this is a hybrid. Some plants have been found with intermediate features. It is not known if any recent research has been done on these two species to confirm their relationship.

Little Robin records from Cambridgeshire have been from sites associated with the railways. Recent expansion of Little Robin may be related to winters with less hard frosts.

Peter Leonard
Rampton, Cambridgeshire.
11th May 2020


All comments welcome.