Erophila ( Common Whitlowgrass)

Erophila (Common Whitlowgrass) and its close relatives.

The fullest and most useful account of Erophila is given in the BSBI Plant Crib ( T.C.G. Rich and A.C. Jermy) by S.A. Filfilan and T.T. Elkington, available on the BSBI website. The second source is the 'Crucifers of Great Britain and Ireland' by Tim Rich BSBI Handbook no 6.

In summary, it would appear to be, that within the UK Erophila is split into three 'species' by chromosome number.

E. majuscula        ( Hairy Whitlowgrass)        Chromosomes 2n=14  (Diploid)
E. verna               ( Common Whitlowgrass)   Chromosomes  2n=30-44
E. glabrescens     ( Glabrous Whitlowgrass)   Chromosomes  2n=52-64

(One cytotype with 2n=24 was only recorded in Germany.)

Key features are:-
E. verna   Variably hairy, petals split more than halfway, leaves tapering to broad stalk, 0.5-1 times as long as leaf blade. (Deep petal groove.)
E.glabrescens  nearly hairless, with longer leaf stalks and less deeply cleft petals.
E. majuscula  leaves densely greyish-hairy, with shorter leaf stalks and less deeply cleft petals.
(Taken from Harrap's Wild Flowers.)

Now if you had the skill and knowledge to do a root tip chromosome count, it would be possible to identify the plants we see but I don't and worse that that, the key features listed in the field guides do not take into account the variation in E. verna. It is not difficult to find plants with a deep petal groove that go from having almost no hairs to very hairy. The deep petal groove suggests these plants are all E. verna ( Common Whitlowgrass).

The chromosome counts indicate that E. majuscula is the original type of Erophila and that evolution has caused more than just a doubling/ tripling/quadrupling of the base number of chromosomes.
 Quite what this range of chromosome counts mean is well beyond my own very limited knowledge. Normally plants go 14, 28, 56  but for example E. verna has been found with 30, 32, 34,36, 40, 42, and 44 chromosomes. This abnormal variation in the number of chromosomes within one species is called Aneuploidy.  Aneuploidy can even occur in the diploid form of some plants ( e.g. Claytonia virginica) but in humans is bad news causing for example, Down's Syndrome.

It is interesting that the polyploid E. verna is by far the most successful type of the three species.

The plant crib article tends to suggest the E. verna leaf is 'lamina scattered to moderate pubescence of mainly branched hairs'. I think this understates the variation of hair density on E. verna.  an example photo follows:-

E. verna from Sutton Gault, Cambs. 14th Feb 2020 Very hairy leaves.

E. verna, same plant as above showing petal cleft/notch.

This Sutton Gault plant is from a population of standard E. verna which have much less hairy leaves, however just a few plants out of several hundred, had this greyish very hairy appearance.

The extent of hairiness appears consistent where plants seem to be clones ( from self pollination) but  a few aberrant plants can occur. The petal cleft is clearly deep but even this feature is not completely reliable. Just occasionally clearly E. verna type plants can have a shortened notch ( this is also noted by Tim Rich in a paper looking at herbarium specimens.)

One might think the grey hairy leaves would make this a E.majuscula but the petioles are too long and the deep petal grooves do not fit the requirements.

Typical E.verna 14th Feb 2020 Sutton Gault.

E. verna showing few hairs 14th Feb 2020 Sutton Gault

Sub-conclusion.   The term 'variably hairy' should not be underestimated. E. verna can vary from very very hairy to almost no hairs. Hairs seem to reduce with age so only new leaves should be considered. This can be seen in the last photo where the lowest leaf has lost most of its hairs.
 Note also the highly variable shape of the petiole and leaves.

Leaves.

What is left to tell these species apart? Next up is the shape of the leaf stem compared to the leaf.  Immediate problem which can be seen in the above photo is where does the leaf start and the petiole finish, as this is not clear to me.  It would seem hard to assess and plants are highly variable.  Some leaves can have a tooth ( or teeth) but this is another variable feature like the hairs being simple or forked.

E verna This plant has attempted to 'self mark' the extent of leaf vs petiole but failed to do it correctly!. Nice try.

One comment is that these leaves do have prominent leaf stalks so that would exclude E majuscula.

Before moving on what does a petal cleft/notch look like.
Petals.

E. verna has cleft from 1/2 to 3/4 of their length
E. majuscula and E. glabrescens , petals bifid to not more than 1/2 their length.

E. verna 14th Feb 2020 Sutton Gault. Normal deep notch in each of the four petals.

E. verna  deep petal notch visible. 14th Feb 2020 Sutton Gault

Petal notch not quite half length, 18th March 2020. 

Petal notch short, 18th March 2020

Petal notch short 27th March 2020

Once familiar with the petals of E. verna the shorter petal notches of glabrescens/majuscula stand out  quite easily. It helps if the flowers are fully open but even if not, the difference is usually clear.  In Erophila some plants are not so clear cut and E. verna occasionally has short notches . In Europe, work by Jordan/Rosen back in the nineteenth century, spilt E. verna into 53 species, some based on petals that were enlarged or had very had narrow petals, so in the UK we are seeing only part of the possible variation.

Stems
The Handbook No 6 shows another feature.
E. majuscula   Flowering stems densely hairy and with at least scattered hairs beyond the first pedicel ( stalk of a flower).
E. verna   Scattered hairs on flowering stems on lower part, upper parts and pedicels no hairs.
E. glabrecens  Flowering stems with hairs on lower part only or no hairs.

Typical E. verna with no stem hairs on upper parts and pedicels but
many hairs will have fallen off at this fruiting stage.

Often E. verna has stem hairs up to the first stem spit and occasionally just above.

E. verna with new stem showing many hairs but the older stem with only a few at the lower end.

A problem with hairs is in Erophila they fall off quite quickly.  By the time the fruit have developed the stems will often have no hairs left, even when they started out very hairy. Stem hairs ideally should be checked at pre-fruiting stage before their number and extent is reduced.

Plants with extreme features that might suggest they are not E.verna.
A) Potential candidate for E. glabrescens

Leaves have almost no hairs. 17th March 2020 Girton, Cambridge.

The plant above was in a group of E. verna but just a few plants had no hairs.
a) The leaves were green with just a few hairs along the margin even when new.
b) The stem had no hairs, even near the base on pre-fruiting stems.
c‚ The petiole ( leaf stem) looks quite long compared to the leaf blade however this seems a very variable feature. I am not sure this can be used to distinguish from E. verna.
e) The sepals surrounding the petals have no hairs. E. verna can have sepal hairs or no sepal hairs. E. majuscula seems always to have hairy sepals.
d) The petals have a notch less than half way.

The combination of the listed features would suggest this is a E. glabrescens.   The seed size is the same as E.verna so there was little point waiting until the plant fruited (fresh seeds 0.5-0.8 mm). The number of seeds in each fruit can be 20-60 for E. glabrescens and 15-50 for E. verna.  The combination of features is the critical factor as any individual feature is not totally reliable. This is very probably E. glabrescens but it is hard to be certain without backing the identification with a chromosomes count.

B) Potential candidate for E. majuscula 

Short petiole gives tight rosette of leaves.  18th March 2020. Isleham Plantation

Enlargement to show new leaves. Note also sepals have hairs.

The compact rosette due to the short petioles is quite different to the normal E. verna growing at the same site.  This feature suggests the plant is a  E. majuscula but it has leaves that are not hairy!.  This would surely be a problem but the new leaves as shown in the enlargement of the rosette, do show early leaves have dense hairs. The leaves are green and shiny but I have seen huge variation in E. verna, so I am not surprised potential E. majuscula could have these features. In fact the Plant crib says majuscula leaves often appear grey , so therefore some do not. The key feature is the very compact form of the rosette caused by the short petioles.

Next step was to check petals notch. Some flowers had a short notch but others were more marginal.

Petal notch less that half way.

Next check if hairs go beyond the first pedicel.

Stem is very hairy and although this photo does not show it well, hairs went beyond the first pedicel.

Stem hairs go up beyond 1st and 2nd junction even when fruiting has started on top right flower.

The stem hairs are often lost by the time the fruits appear so only look at stem with flowers before pollination. Those with fruits will have lost all or most of their hairs. Sepals have hairs.

A small percentage ( est. 5-10%) of plants at this sandy site showed consistent features of very short petioles giving the rosette a compact shape, petals with short notches and hairs that went beyond the first (and second) pedicle.  These plants could be E. majuscula.  

As the population of these compact rosette examples was quite large, well in excess of twenty plants, two samples were taken and potted up, so that seed length could be measured when fruits matured. 

E. majuscula is supposed to have smaller seeds at 0.3 to 0.5mm whereas E. verna/glabrescens has seeds 0.5 to 0.8mm.

 When two plants were measured the first one had seeds in range 0.47 to 0.57mm and the second from 0.4 to 0.59mm, with mean length of 0.54 and 0.5mm. (E. verna seeds ranged from 0.5 to 0.75mm in my sample).   This suggests that in practice there is some overlap in seed length but on average the seed size is less than E. verna.  In Pot 2, some fruit contained seeds that were all below 0.5mm but not all fruit conformed to the expected limit of 0.5mm. All seeds measured were fresh, not long dried herbarium samples.

1st Plant from Isleham Plantation in Pot 1.

2nd March 2020. Potted up potential E. majuscula, note hairs on stem even at fruiting stage go above first junction.

Plant 1 still in flower on 22nd April 2020.

Enlarged version of above photo showing a few forked hairs on stem above third junction.
You will not see these hairs without a lot of magnification but a few are left even at fruiting stage, in this case at least.

2nd plant from Isleham Plantation in Pot 2

Potential E. majuscula

Seeds from 1st plant

The Erophila aggregate group have had a long and troubled history with several attempts to describe species from Mr Jordan back in 1864 to the chromosome count method used today. The basic problem is relating the chromosome count to features that can be easily observed. The common E. verna shows a lot of variation and the field guides do not describe the complexity.

The reproduction system forming populations of clones and the aneuploidy are surely a warning that separating these three species is not going to be easy.

Hopefully my photos show this group with enough attention to the detail so that some plants can be at least considered as candidates for E. majuscula and possible the even more difficult E glabrescens. Identification has to be based on a full range of features. If only I could count the chromosomes....

The Isleham site for the E. majuscula was found by Alan Leslie.  Interestingly a plant taken by Alan Leslie from the Isleham site had all seeds measuring below 0.5mm showing sample size is a important factor in the determination of limits. Alan's sample has been confirmed as E. majuscula by the BSBI referee Dr T Elkington.


Comments welcome. The season is now over, so we will have to wait until next February to start again to improve our knowledge of these charming plants. The Girton site for the E. glabrescens was found by Jonathan Shanklin. The Isleham site for the E. majuscula was found by Alan Leslie.  At least this year with help from Alan Leslie regarding E. majuscula,  some progress has been made.


Peter Leonard
Rampton
Cambridgeshire
2nd May 2020

The stigma is held very close to the pollen bearing anthers in the open flower on the right and then elongates past the anthers on the left flower.  

From O Winge, 1940  showing just how much work was done on E verna in the past. A small extract follows:-

The present  investigation  confirms  the  view  that  the  Erophiln- 

microspecies  biologically  really behave as a series  of  Linnean species. 

They  are  constant  and  have  different  chromosome  numbers.  Their 

hybrids  are more  or less  sterile,  owing to abnormalities  during  the 

meiosis.  They are able to give constant amphidiploid hybrids.  When 

nevertheless  the collective species Erophila verna is commonly regarded 

as a good  Linnean species  by  taxonomists this  is  the outcome of  our 

defective classification  of  the phenomena in  Nature. 

1940 article at A CASE OF AMPHIDIPLOIDY WITHIN THE COLLECTIVE ...onlinelibrary.wiley.com › j.1601-5223.1933.tb02609.x


Reference of Watsonia paper by Tim Rich and J Lewis 1999 containing in particular comment on how difficult it is to  separate verna from glabrescens in Results section


http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats22p377.pdf


End

Rough Hawkbit vs Lesser Hawkbit Phyllaries.

Rough Hawkbit vs Lesser Hawkbit Phyllaries.
A few additional images to demonstrate the differences in the phyllaries (involucral bracts) of Rough and Lesser Hawkbit.
This photographs supplement my original blog Hawkbits (Leontodon) from 22Dec2017 which should be read first. There is also a blog 'Leontodon Achene Photos' 21Nov2018.

Rough Hawkbit ( Leontodon hispidus)

Lesser Hawkbit ( Leontodon saxatilis)

Rough Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Rough Hawkbit

Rough Hawkbit

Many Lesser Hawkbit have a clear brown

edging to the inner phyllaries which can be quite distinctive.
Rough Hawkbit can also have brown edging but usually it merges into the green centre of the phyllaries without having a distinct edge.

Lesser Hawkbit often has no hairs but some have white hairs. In general Rough Hawkbit has  hairs on the phyllaries but occasionally some plants have none. Having no hairs becomes usual for Rough Hawbit in Eastern Europe, east of Vienna but here in the UK hairless Rough Hawkbit might indicate a hybrid.
The outer phyllaries tend to be longer in Rough Hawkbit with the very longest reaching 90% of the inner phyllaries whereas Lesser Hawkbit only reach 50%.

A few more examples for brown edged Lesser Hawkbit follow.

Lesser Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Rough Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Rough Hawkbit

Lesser Hawkbit

Two Classic examples follow.

Lesser Hawkbit , classic example with no hairs, distinct dark outer line to inner phyllaries and short
outer phyllaries.

Lesser Hawkbit but this time with hairs. Note the distinctive dark edging to the inner phyllaries
and the short length of the outer phyllaries.

Rough Hawkbit  showing lots of hairs and very long outer phyllaries.

Below are examples of possible hybrids based on these particular flowers being different from the surrounding population.

As R.A Finch concluded in his famous paper on Leontodons*, ' concealed gene flow occurs both ways between these two species' so hybrids are probably more common that we might think, even if we can't be certain of their identity as hybrids.  

Possible hybrid, no hairs, long outer
phyllaries and no distinct dark edge.

Possible Hybrid. Outer phyllaries not adpressed,
not very hairy but some dark edging.   

Possible Hybrid, brown edging very faint.
Not very hairy.

Rough Hawkbit, Typical with brown edging merging
rather than forming a clear edge. Outer phyllaries
not adpressed. Moderately hairy .

Peter Leonard

Rampton

Cambridge

29th April 2020

*ref . Finch, R. A.   (1967) Natural chromosome variation in Leontodon. Heredity 22;359-386

Geranium in early spring.

Following on from my ID Key on Geraniums and Stork's-bills which was aimed at flowering plants, I have found identification in winter/early spring, introduces the extra complication of winter leaf shape in Cut-leaved Crane's-bill ( G. dissectum) which looks much like G. molle, G. pusillum and G. pyrenaicum. These four species are covered in the following photos.

G. dissectum   5th Feb 2020

Despite the leaf shape changing on certain species like G. dissectum, the petiole (leaf stalk) hairs still provide a reliable method of separating the geraniums. A slight complication is that winter leaf stalks can have fewer hairs. I did find a G. pusillium petiole which had no hairs but fortunately later leaves on the same plant had the normal hairs.

1) G. molle  ( Dove's-foot Crane's-bill)  vs G. pyrenaicum ( Hedgerow Crane's-bill)

These two species share the three types of  leaf stalk hairs, short glandular hairs , short simple hairs and long hairs.  The difference is that the G. molle long hairs are wispy and are even longer than G. pyrenacium.

G. molle showing wispy long hairs. Rampton 24th March 2020

G. molle showing the short glandular hairs , the simple hairs and the long wispy hairs.

G. pyrenaicum showing three types of hair, short glandular, short simple hairs and long hairs.

The long hairs which tend to be angled down on G. pyrenaicum are not wispy but stronger and less bendy.

G. pyrenaicum showing detail of the three types of hairs. Landbeach 24th March 2020
Some of the hairs are angled up to 45 degrees . 

Hedgerow Cranesbill when in flower have flower stems without the long hairs.

G. pyrenaicum flower stalk with no long hairs.

Variation and similarity of the three basic hair types makes this quite difficult. The density of long hairs can vary with some G. molle having a dense layer of these wispy long hairs while other plants may have much fewer.  The Landbeach photo above is slightly odd in that the long hairs are very dense and downward pointing which gets close to the appearance of G. dissectum ( Cut-leaved Crane's-bill). The following photo which shows the same leaf and stem which gives a less detailed view showing that overall the hairs are not as downward pointing as you might expect in G. dissectum. This plus the leaf shape confirmed identity as G. pyrenaicum ( Hedgerow Crane's-bill). Hedgerow Crane's-bill is often a much more robust plant that G. Molle with bigger leaves.

G. pyrenaicum. Landbeach

G. pyrenaicum leaf

2) G. dissectum Cut-leaved Crane's-bill.

G. dissectum winter leaf, Rampton 24th March

First problem is that the winter leaves are not the thin cut versions of summer but rather like the G. molle/G. pusillum/G. pyrenaicum cut to 2/3rds type. Later leaves tend towards the thinner cut leaves as spring passes.

G. dissectum   5th Feb 2020

G. dissectum  leaf showing trend towards summer leaves.

G.dissectum Leaf showing more deeply cut sections. Rampton 24th March 2020

I will let others think about what the advantage of changing the leaf shape from winter to summer is.
Whether the more compact leaf shape is more frost resistant comes to mind.


Petiole (Leaf Stem) hairs.
Not easy to separate from G. pyrenaicum because dissectum can vary from sparse to dense hairs. G. dissectum can sometimes have very few glandular hairs but these are often quite dense just below the leaf. 

G. dissectum  hairs showing short glandular hairs and angled straight hairs.

G. dissectum, less hairy stem. Angled hairs.

Key feature is the straight eglandular hairs are angled downwards at up to 45 degrees. The short glandular hairs are just visible in the top photo. The extremely long hairs that G. molle/G. pyrenaicum show are not present.

3) G. pusillum ( Small-flowered Crane's-bill)

G. pusillum leaf hairs, short glandular hairs plus short glandular hairs. No long hairs.

G. pusillum Devils Ditch, 25th March 2020

Some winter/early spring petioles (leaf stems) have almost no hairs. Normally they have a few short glandular hairs and lots of simple hairs that can be straight or curved. Because the short hairs tend to be all the same length and quite dense they make up a consistent layer.

Conclusion.
Whereas leaf shape is variable, the hairs on the petiole ( leaf stem) do seem to give a consistent method of identification provided you have not found a garden escape which would make the situation much more complicated.

Peter G. Leonard
Rampton
Cambridgeshire.
30th March 2020